The decision in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County limited what aspect of the National Environmental Policy Act?

The decision in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County primarily addressed limitations on the environmental review process mandated by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The ruling clarified the requirements surrounding the assessment and documentation of environmental impacts that federal actions must undergo before approval.

In this case, the court emphasized the importance of thoroughly considering environmental consequences and engaging in an effective review process. By placing limitations on how NEPA's review process is applied, the decision impacts the rigor and breadth of analysis required for proposed projects that are eligible for federal funding or approval. This underlines the significance of the NIMBY (Not In My Backyard) sentiments and potential local impacts that can arise from infrastructure projects.

The other options, while related to the broader implications of NEPA and federal project involvement, do not specifically capture the essence of the ruling pertaining to the procedural aspects of environmental review. Thus, the correct choice highlights the direct impact of the court's decision on the review process itself, emphasizing the careful consideration that must be given to environmental factors in planning and executing federal actions.