The NEPA process typically concludes with which of the following?

The conclusion of the NEPA process is characterized by the completion of either an environmental impact statement (EIS) or an environmental assessment (EA), or the determination of a categorical exclusion. This final decision is essential because it outlines the environmental implications of a proposed federal action and ensures that all relevant impacts are considered before moving forward.

The preparation of an EIS or EA involves thorough evaluation and public involvement, thereby fostering transparency and accountability in the decision-making process. If the proposed action is found to have no significant environmental effects, it may be categorized as a categorical exclusion, thus simplifying the review process. Collectively, these outcomes represent the culmination of the NEPA process, as they finalize the assessment of environmental consequences and guide subsequent actions.

In contrast, the other options represent stages or elements of the NEPA process but do not capture its typical conclusion. For instance, while resubmission of a proposed action may occur if initial assessments indicate significant impacts, it is not part of the final outcome. Similarly, determination of mitigation strategies can be a part of the EIS or EA process but isn't the conclusion itself. Lastly, while a categorical exclusion is a conclusion, it may be framed within the broader context of EIS or EA preparation. This makes the comprehensive