Which Supreme Court decision involved the Secretary of Agriculture directing the removal of excess deer from Kaibab National Forest due to overbrowsing?

The Supreme Court decision that involved the Secretary of Agriculture directing the removal of excess deer from Kaibab National Forest due to overbrowsing is Hunt v. United States. This case is significant because it illustrates the responsibilities and authority of federal agencies in managing wildlife populations to maintain ecological balance. The overpopulation of deer had detrimental effects on the forest's ecosystem, leading to the decision to cull the deer population.

In the context of wildlife management, this case underscores the legal framework that allows government entities to take action when animal populations threaten the health of a habitat. The authority of the Secretary of Agriculture to intervene in wildlife management demonstrates the intersection between environmental conservation and legal oversight.

This decision reinforces the principle of public land management, where the government is tasked with ensuring that natural resources are preserved and balanced effectively, thus highlighting the legal dimensions of conservation efforts.